Rui TAVORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the rationale for these decisions “has generally been either that hair length policies are not within the statutory goal of equal employment .... or that such employment policies have only a de minimis effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).