Ruhe v. Church of Nazarene

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising discretion to reverse plain error when the 338 State v. D. A. appellant had a strong interest in having the wrongful com- mitment reversed and the state and trial court were fully aware of the issues and thus purpose of preservation was served
• civil commitment “deprives a person of his or her constitutionally protected liberty interest, and carries deleterious collateral effects, including a social stigma which affects the person’s reputation and earning potential” (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)
• civil commitment ‘deprives a person of his or her constitutionally protected liberty interest, and carries deleterious collateral effects, including a social stigma which affects the person’s reputation and earning potential’ (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).