Ruger v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of motion for new trial based on expert opinion that method employed by State’s expert in conducting experiment about bloodprints was “scientifically unsound”; new opinion “tendered to disprove the facts on which the [testimony of the State’s expert] was founded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).