Rufus Lee Averhart v. Albert Tutsie, Parole Board Chairman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where Indiana Supreme Court expressly held that state’s parole-release statute created no expectancy of release, the federal court was bound by that interpretation
• where legislature has invested Parole Board with almost total discretion in such matters, inmate had no legitimate expectation of release
• where legislature has invested Parole Board with almost total discretion in such matters, inmate had no legitimate expectation of release
• Where Indiana Supreme Court had expressly held that that state’s parole release statute was unlike Nebraska’s in that it created no expectancy of release, this court is bound by that interpretation
• Where Indiana Supreme Court had expressly held that that state's parole release statute was unlike Nebraska's in that it created no expectancy of release, this court is bound by that interpretation
• where Indiana Supreme Court expressly held that state's parole-release statute created no expectancy of release, the federal court was bound by that interpretation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).