Skip to main content
· 3/25/2004

Rufino Pena, German Alvarado, Rosa Ayala v. American Meat Packing Corporation

Citations

  • 362 F.3d 418
  • 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 116
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5576
  • 2004 WL 584566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Further, if the conditions were unforeseeable, it is unclear whether this qualifies AMPAC for merely a reduction in its required notice period or the complete elimination of it.”
  • “Further, if the conditions were unforeseeable, it is unclear whether this qualifies AMPAC for merely a reduction in its required notice period or the complete elimination of it.”
  • “Because courts are not ‘super-personnel departments] that reexamine[ ] an entity’s business decisions],’ we defer to the [employer’s] decision of what nondiscriminatory qualities it will seek in filling the [ ] posi tion.” (alterations in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.