· 3/25/2004
Rufino Pena, German Alvarado, Rosa Ayala v. American Meat Packing Corporation
Citations
- 362 F.3d 418
- 21 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 116
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5576
- 2004 WL 584566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Further, if the conditions were unforeseeable, it is unclear whether this qualifies AMPAC for merely a reduction in its required notice period or the complete elimination of it.”
- “Further, if the conditions were unforeseeable, it is unclear whether this qualifies AMPAC for merely a reduction in its required notice period or the complete elimination of it.”
- “Because courts are not ‘super-personnel departments] that reexamine[ ] an entity’s business decisions],’ we defer to the [employer’s] decision of what nondiscriminatory qualities it will seek in filling the [ ] posi tion.” (alterations in original
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Wood, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.