Rufino A. Estrada-Martinez v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• confirming “[r]emand is not always necessary,” the ordinary-remand rule embodied in Ventura and Thomas notwithstanding (emphasis added)
• considering whether the BIA overstepped clear-error review as to the IJ's finding of likelihood of torture
• finding the \particularly serious crime\ determination unreviewable because it is inherently discretionary
• whether the Board of Immigration Appeals applied the proper standard of review is a legal question that is reviewed de novo
• whether the Board of Immigration Appeals applied the proper standard of review is a legal question that is reviewed de novo
• whether the Board of Immigration Appeals applied the proper standard of review is a legal question that is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).