Ruffolo v. Parish & Bowman, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a contractor’s construction lien must be discharged for failing to strictly comply with Chapter 713’s requirements, but observing that “cancellation of [the] lien does not leave [the contractor] without a remedy, as it may enforce its contractual claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unnerstall v. Designerick, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-09-18· cited 1×
• Jorge Hernandez v. Burleigh House Condominium, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-08-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSP. OF FLORIDA v. Welker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-14· cited 53×
• Dracon Const., Inc. v. FACILITY CONST. MANAGEMENT, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 13×
• Scott v. Premium Development, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-03-23· cited 12×
• Goldberger v. UNITED PL. & HEAT., INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-05-16· cited 11×
• FEDERATED STORES REALTY v. Burnstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-05· cited 10×
• Sturge v. LCS Development Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-28· cited 6×
• KRASNE-GOLD COAST JOINT VENTURE EX REL. KRASNE HOLLYWOOD, INC. v. Allied Drywall, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-23· cited 5×