Ruffin v. the State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]o fully inform the trial court and permit a ruling, the defendant must articulate the specific basis for objecting to the [evidence]”
• witness-drawn diagram properly allowed to go out with jury because diagram was not the \functional equivalent of a deposition\ and did not constitute \testimonial documentary evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).