Skip to main content

Ruffin v. State

Citations

  • 447 So. 2d 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an indigent defendant’s statutory “right to defense expenses . . . is conditioned upon a showing that such expenses are needed to prepare and present an adequate defense” (quoting State v. Acosta, 597 P.2d 1282, 1284 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)) (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broom, P.J., and Hawkins and Dan M. Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.