Skip to main content
· 1/19/1995

Ruff v. County of King

Citations

  • 887 P.2d 886
  • 125 Wash. 2d 697
  • 1995 Wash. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that municipalities are not required \to update every road and roadway structure to present-day standards\
  • \[a] county has a duty to maintain its roadways in a reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel by persons using them in a proper manner\
  • “[a] county has a duty to maintain its roadways in a reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel by persons using them in a proper manner”
  • questions of fact may be determined as a matter of law when reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion
  • questions of fact may be determined as a matter of law when reasonable minds could reach but one conclusion
  • \county has a duty to maintain its roadways in a reasonably safe condition for ordinary travel by persons using them in a proper manner\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.