Rufener v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “part-time businesses are businesses for the purposes of the exclusion”
• concluding it was “of no importance” that an insured “worked full-time in another job,” “because part-time businesses are businesses for the purposes of the exclusion, so long as they meet the requirements of the Bertler test”
• \The exception to the business pursuits exclusion has been heavily litigated in many jurisdictions with varying results that cannot be fully reconciled.\
• \The exception to the business pursuits exclusion has been heavily litigated in many jurisdictions with varying results that cannot be fully reconciled.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).