Idaho Supreme Court· 7/10/1978
Rueth v. State
Citations
- 596 P.2d 75
- 100 Idaho 203
- 1978 Ida. LEXIS 468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in eminent domain proceedings, all issues other than just compensation, including an accurate description of the property taken, are for resolution by the trial court and not the jury
- holding that in eminent domain proceedings, all issues other than just compensation, including an accurate description of the property taken, are for resolution by the trial court and not the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bistline, McFadden, Bakes, Donaldson, Shepard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-04-30· cited 98×
- State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-07-27· cited 78×
- Tibbs v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court· 1979-12-06· cited 47×
- Ada County Highway District ex rel. Fairbanks v. AcarrequiIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-12-21· cited 47×
- State v. McKinneyIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-07-26· cited 43×
- McQuillen v. City of AmmonIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-12-03· cited 30×
- Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court· 2004-08-02· cited 30×
- Slaathaug v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-03-31· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Ohman v. Ivan H. Talbot Family TrustIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-11-12· cited 21×
- BHA Investments, Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 19×
- Roll v. City of MiddletonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1989-03-09· cited 18×
- Covington v. Jefferson CountyIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-08-16· cited 12×
- State v. RandolphIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-03-19· cited 11×
- Merritt v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-07-10· cited 11×
- City of Pocatello v. AndertonIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-03-29· cited 9×
- City of Lewiston v. LindseyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-03-03· cited 8×
- State v. HernandezIdaho Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 7×
- Hinman v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-03-31· cited 7×
- Union Pacific R. Co. v. State of IdahoD. Idaho· 1987-03-04· cited 7×
- Reisenauer v. State, Dept. of HighwaysIdaho Court of Appeals· 1991-07-01· cited 5×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1978-06-29· cited 1,267×
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court· 1946-05-27· cited 1,036×
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 585×
- United States v. CressSupreme Court· 1917-03-12· cited 427×
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-03-04· cited 382×
- Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co.Supreme Court· 1919-05-19· cited 235×
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-12-21· cited 216×
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-12-21· cited 192×
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court· 1964-08-20· cited 119×
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1962-11-07· cited 110×
- Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-08-19· cited 61×
- Ah Fook Chang v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1937-07-26· cited 51×
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-22· cited 41×
- Arrington v. RobertsonThird Circuit· 1940-09-09· cited 41×
- Renninger v. StateIdaho Supreme Court· 1950-01-12· cited 36×
- Mabe v. State Ex Rel. RichIdaho Supreme Court· 1961-03-31· cited 36×
- Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1952-03-08· cited 34×
- Thornburg v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1966-06-22· cited 27×
- Cooper v. Wesco Builders, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1955-03-18· cited 27×
- State v. SlyIdaho Supreme Court· 1905-05-24· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.