Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that re-opening a case under Rule 60(c)(2) requires the newly discovered evidence be more than merely cumulative
• noting that an agency relationship may be implied from the words and conduct of the parties notwithstanding a denial by the alleged principal
• noting that if the Legislature had intended the statute to apply to “ ‘special orders’ made after any and all ‘judgments,’ it presumably would have had no reason to instead use the phrase ‘final judgment’ ”
• noting that if the Legislature had intended the statute to apply to “‘special orders’ made after any and all ‘judgments,’ it presumably would have had no reason to instead use the phrase ‘final judgment’”
• explaining “review on appeal is limited to the rulings specified in the notice of appeal”
• limiting appellate review to “rulings specified in the notice of appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).