Skip to main content
· 9/19/1979

Ruedas v. State

Citations

  • 586 S.W.2d 520
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing defendant’s request for closing argument when defense counsel explicitly requested it
  • holding trial court abused its discretion in refusing defendant’s request for closing argument when defense counsel explicitly requested it
  • refusal to allow closing argument in probation revocation proceeding violates State constitutional right to counsel
  • refusal to allow closing argument in probation revocation proceeding violates State constitutional right to counsel
  • cases requiring objection to preserve denial of closing argument for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.