· 9/19/1979
Ruedas v. State
Citations
- 586 S.W.2d 520
- 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing defendant’s request for closing argument when defense counsel explicitly requested it
- holding trial court abused its discretion in refusing defendant’s request for closing argument when defense counsel explicitly requested it
- refusal to allow closing argument in probation revocation proceeding violates State constitutional right to counsel
- refusal to allow closing argument in probation revocation proceeding violates State constitutional right to counsel
- cases requiring objection to preserve denial of closing argument for appellate review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.