Rudoy v. Rudoy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 applies only to federal district courts.
• holding that the Court of Federal Claims had pendant jurisdiction over a state law contract claim that was part of the same case as a claim over which the Court of Federal Claims had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b)
• holding that the Court of Federal Claims had pendant jurisdiction over a state law contract claim that was part of the same case as a claim over which the FILIPCZYK v. US 8 Court of Federal Claims had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b)
• stating that 28 U.S.C. § 1367 “only applies specifically to federal district courts”
• describing the history and application of pendent jurisdiction in federal courts, including the Court of Federal Claims
• using pendent jurisdiction to resolve a threshold issue of copyright ownership, under state law, to resolve a challenge to the plaintiff’s standing to bring suit in this court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).