Rudolph v. Herman
Citations
- 4 S.D. 203
- 56 N.W. 122
- 1893 S.D. LEXIS 68
Syllabus
<p>1. When an appeal from a justice’s court has been dismissed by the circuit court, and the order dismissing such appeal has been affirmed by the supreme court, the jurisdiction of the circuit court over the case is at ■an end; ánd a motion made to such circuit ‘court, after the decision of the supreme court, by the appellant for leave to file a new or amended appeal bond, in order to perfect his appeal from the justice’s court, is properly denied.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the court.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court no longer had jurisdiction of case after affirmance of dismissal of appeal of case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Madeksho v. Abraham, Watkins, Nichols & FriendTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-10· cited 74×
- Todd v. ToddSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-06-15· cited 5×
- Doering v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1902-07-02· cited 3×
- Wasem v. BellachSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1903-12-29· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-07-10
- Rudolph v. HermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1893-12-20
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.