Rudolph KELLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing requirements of 20 C.F.R., Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, 5.05(F)(1), (2), and (3)
• finding no error where the ALJ sought VE testimony to address limitations falling between two ranges of work
• upholding an ALJ’s finding that the claimant’s testimony that he 11 needed a two-hour nap each day was inconsistent with the fact that he failed to report such a restriction to a physician
• reviewing medical evidence, noting that no physician had stated claimant was disabled
• affirming finding of no disability when pain and symptoms were “well-controlled”
• condition is not disabling unless it is so functionally limiting as to preclude any substantial gainful activity for at least twelve consecutive months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).