Rudolph Feuereisen Realty Corp. v. Brandt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the imposition of such costs did not violate 27 due process where: (1) the decision to impose costs was discretionary, (2) precedent required the board to consider the afore-mentioned factors, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).