Skip to main content
· 3/24/2006

Rudite Pede v. Alberto R. Gonzales

Citations

  • 442 F.3d 570
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 7315
  • 2006 WL 743297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the denial of a continuance based on the ultimate hopelessness of an adjustment application is “perfectly acceptable”
  • holding that “ultimate hopelessness” of ap- plication for adjustment of status is “perfectly acceptable basis” for denying continuance
  • holding that IJ has no duty to alert alien about availability of poten- tial relief that IJ already has evaluated and determined to be unavailable
  • holding that the denial of a continuance based on the ultimate hopelessness of an adjustment application is “perfectly acceptable”
  • holding that where IJ made preliminary finding that alien was not eligible for voluntary departure and attorney did not object, any error in failing to notify alien of possible relief was harmless
  • stating that the denial of a continuance was not an abuse of discretion, given the “ultimate hopelessness” of the adjustment application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Evans, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.