Rudisell v. Paquette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to impose sanctions with only a finding that the motion “appears to have ‘merit’”
• sanctions order stated only that “it appear[s] that the Request for Sanctions in Respondent’s Response has merit”
• “[t]he use of ‘shall’ in the statute indicates that the requirement for particularity in the sanction order is mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).