Skip to main content
· 11/6/1997

Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.

Citations

  • 982 F. Supp. 355
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18150
  • 1997 WL 709964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant may be liable for a trespass when contaminants will, to a substantial certainty, reach the plaintiffs property
  • need to install wells to monitor water quality presented jury question whether defendant’s invasion was substantial
  • need actual interference [cause] substantial enough to reduce market value [effect]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eliason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.