Rucker v. Everen Securities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to prove promissory estoppel, “a plaintiff must show the existence of a promise that the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance by the promisee and that does induce such action or forbearance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simon Property Group, L.P. v. Kill
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-04-05· cited 10×
• Zapata Real Estate, L.L.C. v. Monty Realty, Ltd.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 10×
• Ringhand v. Chaney
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-25· cited 9×
• Dart v. Katz
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 9×
• Moellering Industries, Inc. v. Nalagatla
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-16· cited 5×
• Mischer v. Erie Metropolitan Housing Authority
  N.D. Ohio· 2004-11-19· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 488×
• Galmish v. Cicchini
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 300×
• Karnes v. Doctors Hospital
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 76×

Other cases named Rucker v. Everen Securities, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Rucker v. Everen Securities, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-07-30
• Rucker v. Everen Securities, Inc.
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-08-25