· 5/5/1954
Ruck v. Spray Cotton Mills, Inc.
Citations
- 120 F. Supp. 944
- 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Motions for reconsideration are disfavored . . . and are not the place for parties to make new arguments not raised in their original briefs.”
- “Motions for reconsideration . . . are not the place for parties to 19 make new arguments not raised in their original briefs.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Warlick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.