Skip to main content
· 5/5/1954

Ruck v. Spray Cotton Mills, Inc.

Citations

  • 120 F. Supp. 944
  • 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3661

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Motions for reconsideration are disfavored . . . and are not the place for parties to make new arguments not raised in their original briefs.”
  • “Motions for reconsideration . . . are not the place for parties to 19 make new arguments not raised in their original briefs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warlick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.