Ruch v. City of Philadelphia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for plain error whether the district court’s comments at sentencing violated the defendant’s constitutional rights because the defendant did not object in the district court
• reviewing for plain error whether the district court’s comments at sentencing violated the defendant’s constitutional right to remain silent because the defendant did not object to those comments in the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).