Skip to main content
· 11/4/1992

Ruby Nnadi v. Robert Richter, District Director, United States Customs Service

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 682
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28475
  • 1992 WL 295253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying 19 U.S.C. § 1615 to a forfeiture action under Section 1595a
  • Plaintiffs, “as movant[s], bore the burden of proving each of these four factors.” (citing Canal Authority, 489 F.2d at 573)
  • “The Supreme Court has set forth a four-part test for determining whether an unreasonable delay has transpired between seizure of forfeitable property and a final hearing concerning the ultimate disposition of the property seized.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Clark, Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.