Rubin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the State Farm exclusion at issue does not apply with respect to workers’ com pensation benefits paid but ultimately reimbursed from the insured’s third-party recovery”
• explaining that a latent ambiguity exists when otherwise clear language, when applied to the facts at issue, renders uncertain results
• explaining that a latent ambiguity exists when otherwise clear language, when applied to the facts at issue, renders uncertain results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).