Skip to main content
· 3/3/2006

Rubin v. Sona International Corp.

Citations

  • 457 F. Supp. 2d 191
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8379
  • 2006 WL 525658

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing to arbitration where party challenged legality of entire Franchise Agreement
  • where all issues in complaint must be submitted to arbitration, case may be dismissed rather than stayed
  • “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [plaintiff] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”
  • “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [plaintiff] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”
  • “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [the plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [it] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.