· 3/3/2006
Rubin v. Sona International Corp.
Citations
- 457 F. Supp. 2d 191
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8379
- 2006 WL 525658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing to arbitration where party challenged legality of entire Franchise Agreement
- where all issues in complaint must be submitted to arbitration, case may be dismissed rather than stayed
- “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [plaintiff] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”
- “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [plaintiff] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”
- “Buckeye Check Cashing makes clear that whether [the plaintiff] argues that the agreement is void or voidable, [it] may only avoid arbitration if it can successfully challenge the validity of the arbitration clause itself.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.