Rubin v. Matthews International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that whether defendant's repeated misrepresentations to the plaintiff that the headstone she purchased would be delivered in time for the funeral of a loved one was extreme and outrageous conduct was an issue of fact for the jury
• relying on Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 46, comment h, at 77
• untimely delivery of a memorial stone does not fall under these exceptions under the previous rule that a claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress does not exist without either accompanying physical consequences or an independent underlying tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).