Rubin v. Fuchs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “whenever possible the courts will construe promises in a bilateral contract as mutually dependent and concurrent” and that “neither party can place the other in default unless he is fully able to perform or make a tender of the promised performance”
• whenever possible courts will construe promises in a bilateral contract as mutually dependent and concurrent
• “[P]rovisions of a contract will not be construed as conditions precedent in the absence of language plainly requiring such construction.”
• \ 'Subject to' is generally construed to impose a condition precedent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).