Rubenstein v. Upper Pittsgrove Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although the taxpayer made 22 sales over a three-year period, the taxpayer did not hold the property for sale
• reiterating that it is not the duty of an appellate court to retry the facts, even where the court is convinced that it would have \drawn different inferences than did the district court\
• “specific factors, or combinations of them, are not necessarily controlling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).