Skip to main content
· 6/7/1949

Rubenstein v. Philip Morris Dress Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 275 A.D.2d 902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • commenting that “a temporary interruption for a purpose related the carriage itself does not remove the property from transportation.” [emphasis added]
  • transport for purpose of exhibition covered by due-course-of-transit clause
  • transport for purpose of exhibition covered by due-course-of-transit clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.