Rubenstein v. Imlach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The contractor must knowingly present the false claim with the intention of being paid for it.”
• “The Government, and indirectly the American people [are] not required to be ‘saddled’ with contractors who used illegal means to win their contracts.”
• “The contractor must knowingly present the false claim with the intention of being paid for it.”
• “The contractor must knowingly present the false claim with the intention of being paid for it.”
• “The contractor must knowingly present the false claim with the intention of being paid for it.”
• “We did not have such a level of confidence in plaintiff's experts. Cross examination showed their choices of productive and non-productive periods to be arbitrary at best. More likely, they were chosen to achieve a pre-determined result.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).