Ruben Pena v. Edward Mattox, Charles Bretz, Patricia Schneider, and Others Unknown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]dultery [and] fornication [laws] remain on the statute books, archaic and unenforced, as a residue of legislative in- ertia.”
• \It would not do to strip a judge or prosecutor of his immunity merely because he conspired with nonimmune persons.\
• \It would not do to strip a judge or prosecutor of his immunity merely because he conspired with nonimmune persons.\
• perpetration of serious criminal act does not create an interest that constitution protects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).