Ruben Nunez-Pena v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Immigration and Naturalization Service abused its discretion when it “suddenly 2 See Araiza v. Barr, 803 F. App’x 215, 219-20 (10th Cir. 2020) (unpublished
• noting the Board’s adoption of the outstanding and unusual equities requirement for section 212(c) relief to aliens deportable for committing serious crimes
• impermissibly suggestive in-court identification rendered harmless by other identifications that “would have served to convict Archibald.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).