Ruben Gonzales v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ may determine that “subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary”
• holding that an ALJ may determine that “subjective pain complaints are not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary”
• explaining that a claimant whose impairment medically equals a listing is “automatically found disabled and is entitled to benefits”
• holding the ALJ may find a claimant’s subjective pain complaints not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary
• holding the ALJ may find a claimant’s subjective pain complaints not credible in light of objective medical evidence to the contrary
• holding the ALJ may find a claimant’s subjective pain complaints not credible considering objective medical evidence to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).