Skip to main content

Ruben D. Marquez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing statutory 7 interpretation and judicial goal of determining intent from the words chosen by the legislature
  • discussing instances in which an insurer “communicate[s] that, under [a] policy, the term insured does not always mean ‘any’ insured person, but sometimes, only ‘the’ insured claiming coverage”
  • discussing instances in which an insurer “communicate[s] that, under [a] policy, the term insured does not always mean ‘any’ insured person, but sometimes, only ‘the’ insured claiming coverage”
  • discussing instances in which an insurer “eommunieate[s] that, under [a] policy, the term insured does not always mean ‘any’ insured person, but sometimes, only ‘the’ insured claiming coverage”
  • discussing instances in which an insurer “communicate[s] that, under [a] policy, the term insured does not always mean ‘any’ insured person, but sometimes, only ‘the’ insured claiming coverage”
  • stating the court reviews contract interpretation and construction for errors at law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.