Ruben Castaneda v. United States Department of Agriculture, Does I-X, Inclusive

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because we affirm the dismissal of Castaneda’s action on the merits, we need not resolve the dispute between the parties as to whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity bars his action against the USDA.”
• “Castaneda was only an 23 indirect beneficiary of the government’s statutory relationship with The Circle K Corporation 24 allowing it to participate in the food stamp program . . . hence Castaneda is not a direct target of 25 the government’s disqualification decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).