· 7/23/1999
Rubberflex Sdn. Bhd. v. United States
Citations
- 59 F. Supp. 2d 1338
- 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 461
- 23 C.I.T. 461
- 21 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1613
- 1999 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 63
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “each administrative review is a separate proceeding”
- where the court declined to hear certain arguments made by plaintiff because the arguments were not included in the case brief submitted to the agency
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goldberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.