Rubber Millers, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that potential subcontractors did not have standing to sue under the Armed Services Procurement Act.
• finding no subcon- tractor standing because Rubber Millers was a “subcon- tractor [who] has never submitted a bid to the Navy,” and all “[t]he statutory provisions cited by the plaintiff are di- rected exclusively at ‘contractors’ and bidders,” not subcon- tractors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).