Rubalcava v. Felker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a challenge “the execution of a sentence” may include a challenge to “prison conditions” (emphasis in original)
• noting that “monetary loss is a quintessential injury in fact, and even a small financial loss suffices to establish standing” (quotation marks omitted)
• noting that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ray effectively “abolished the concurrent sentence doctrine for direct review of federal convictions” (alteration adopted) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• applying the standard where defendant murdered witnesses after one witness started questioning the organization’s illegal activities and the other began cooperating with state police
• discussing the “in custody” requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2241, § 2254, and § 2255
• construing habeas petition purportedly filed pursuant to Section 2241 as a second motion to vacate under Section 2255

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).