Skip to main content
· 7/3/2014

R.T. Foods, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 757 F.3d 1349
  • 2014 WL 2981004
  • 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 340
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a heading \is a 'basket provision' \ if it contains \the terms 'not elsewhere specified or included' \
  • “If the proper heading can be determined under GRI 1, the court is not to look to the subsequent GRIs.”
  • “A basket provision is not a specific provision . . . classification of imported merchandise in a basket provision is only appropriate if there is no tariff category that covers the merchandise more specifically”
  • “[A] court first construes the language of the heading, and any section or chapter notes in question, to determine whether the product at issue is classifiable under the heading.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dyk, Clevenger, Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.