RT Computer Graphics, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, as the hearsay exception in Evid.R. 803(4) was firmly rooted, the statements made by a juvenile sex offense victim during treatment could be admitted without denying the defendant his right to confrontation
• holding that in cases in which there is hearsay that could be admitted under Evid.R. 803, 804, or 807, the trial court judge retains discretion to determine which hearsay exception, if any, is most appropriate to admit the evidence
• allowing expert’s testimony that certain instruments were securities within the meaning of the Revised Code
• explaining the factors that courts should consider in determining whether a child’s statement regarding sexual assault should be admitted pursuant to Ohio Evid. R. 803(4)
• admitting a four-year-old alleged sexual abuse victim’s statement to a physician identifying Defendant as her abuser under Evid.R. 803(4), the medical diagnosis or treatment exception to the hearsay -6- rule
• “trial court has broad discretion to determine whether a declaration should be admissible as a hearsay exception”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).