RST (2005) INC. v. Research in Motion Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] motion under Rule 6.3 should not be used to advance theories not previously argued.”
• \the weight of authority in this district strongly supports the dismissal of an implied covenant claim based on the same underlying facts as a breach of contract claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).