RPR & ASSOCIATES v. O'Brien/Atkins Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Provident Tradesmans Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson, 390 U.S. 102, 118 (1968)
• “Rule 12(b)(7) permits a motion to dismiss when there is an absent person without whom complete relief cannot be granted.”
• “Rule 19 is not triggered by the possibility of a subsequent adjudication that may result in a judgment that is inconsistent as a matter of logic.”
• “Rule 19(a)(2)(ii) protects against obligations that are inconsistent rather than adjudications that are inconsistent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).