Rozzelle v. University of North Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the analysis under § 1404(a) is \distinct\ from the analysis under the first-filed rule
• observing that “even where a party to a franchise agreement is a Minnesota corporation, the agreement is not within the purview of the MFA if the franchisee is not located in and does not operate in Minnesota” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that “even where a party to a franchise agreement is a Minnesota corporation, the agreement is not within the purview of the MFA if the franchisee is not located in and does not operate in Minnesota” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).