Rozsa v. May Davis Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing a breach of contract claim where the nonmoving party failed to allege facts establishing that the parties mutually agreed to the terms of the contract
• applying contract law to determine the existence of a special deposit, because it resembles a bailment, and because of the well-established rule that “a bailment is contingent on the existence of an express or implied contract”
• finding no special deposit on motion to dismiss where the plaintiff failed to assert facts or argue any inferences that the defendant had assented even to an implied contract, much less and express one, to create bailment with funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).