Rozier v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that causation under ORS 659A.030(1)(f
• stating that causation under ORS 659A.030(1)(f
• “[P]laintiff must prove that defendant’s unlawful motive was a substantial factor in his termination, or, in other words, that he would have been treated differently in the absence of the unlawful motive.”
• ”[P]laintiff must prove that defendant’s unlawful motive was a substantial factor in his termination, or, in other words, that he would have been treated differently in the absence of the unlawful motive.”
• “[P]laintiff must prove that defendant’s unlawful motive was a substantial factor in his termination, or, in other words, that he would have been treated differently in the absence of the unlawful motive.”
• applying this test to a claim under ORS 659A.030(1)(f)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).