Rozell v. Childers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statute of frauds did not preclude claims of the existence of a $12,000 loan based on oral trial testimony
• concluding that statute of frauds did not preclude claims of the existence of a $12,000 loan based on oral trial testimony
• holding the Statute of Frauds did not bar a claim for account stated because an oral agreement to repay money already lent falls outside the Statute of Frauds
• same in the context of a debt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).