Roynell Joshua v. The United States, on Motion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this court \does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of district courts ... relating to proceedings before those courts\
• holding that this court \does not have jurisdiction to review the decisions of district courts ... relating to proceedings before those courts\
• holding that this Court “has no jurisdiction to adjudicate any claims whatsoever under the federal criminal code”
• holding that the Court of Federal Claims cannot review the decisions of other courts relating to proceedings before those courts
• holding that the United States Court of Federal Claims \has no jurisdiction to adjudicate any claims whatsoever under the federal criminal code\
• holding that this court \does not have jurisdiction to r eview the decisions of district courts . .. relating to proceedings before t hose courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).