Royesky v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the subject appeal was of a public nature because the outcome would affect all state and county employees
• holding that the question in the case was of a public nature because the outcome would affect all state and county employees
• noting that sovereign immunity will not be a bar where governmental action is challenged as unconstitutional
• noting that at the pleading stage, general factual allegations of injury resulting from the defendant’s conduct may suffice
• “[Standing is a jurisdictional issue that may be addressed at any stage of a ease[.]”
• applying HRS § 632-1 in a suit seeking a declaration that the State had violated the article XVI, section 2 prohibition on the impairment of accrued retirement system benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).